Elsa's Newsletter On Substack - Increasing Personal Perception and Effective Legal Options
Programming Brief 12-06-2023
Hello. The weekly format was interrupted yesterday, but al is well. Today I wanted to focus on a a currently active IRUUR1 influencer.
In our weekend post on Sunday, we talked about the personal skillset required to influence the impersonal mathematics of the energy environment in the formation of reality. Elsa’s newsletter is published to develop a personal skillset able to arrive at a real perspective and achieve verifiable results.
Biosphere
Resonance
VLF Openlab Observatories Network - Overview
Environment
Oppenheimer Ranch Project premiering now: Atmospheric Rivers Bring Rain & Snow To The PNW - Arlington House Explosion - Terror Threat Elevated
Suspicious0bservers uploaded: Solar Flares, Iceberg, Atmospheric River | S0 News Dec.6.2023
Resources
Americans Need An Extra $11,400 Today To Afford What They Had In 2021
Elsa’s Newsletter
Elsa writes on Substack and has been an influential, Official, IRUUR1 Informal Contributor since her leadership in freeing Reiner Fuelmich became important in the political arena. It is difficult to increase awareness in the political system, from a level of perception outside of the limits of the left-right, political party arena.
Elsa recently posted two newsletters that will be interesting to readers here.
Elsa has a model to increase perception as a basic step in countering systematically programmed perception. Her model for gaining perspective on the New Age-y programmed reality about attracting energy is significant. My new age-y experience has seen what was an exploration for truth be infiltrated in many podcasts by promoted leaders in the new movement, by elite agenda sponsorship and messaging. A lot of new-agers thought and still think Trump is the devil and Obama at least represents the "consciousness" of caring for one another and the planet. The truth is neither of these two Presidents has performed under the Constitution in government service, outside of significant elite criminal influence and funding. But all beliefs can be induced into participating in a pre-programmed political system where people like Reiner Fuelmich is, in prison over a bookkeeping discrepancy, while Trump and Obama are free to be role models, inducing people into programed political conflicts, where the outcome is already determined.
The political actors and interests trapped in the political system fear us and Reiner because our efforts take real politics and people's political energy out of the left-right party system, weakening their objectives and exposing flaws within it by denying energy to the political system that it needs, to project the power necessary to obscure those flaws in the system.
Our harmless action of increasing our knowledge and developing informational, political, and legal assets outside of the system naturally cripples any system, which is based on a calculable finite number of managed, potential, and available resources. No longer feeding our resources and attention into the systems programmed solutions, makes us a threat and target.
Turning The Tables
The only difference in the current stature of Trump, Obama, and Reiner is public perception of their significance and existence. The system currently has the power and is projecting energy to obscure Reiner's existence and significance, and now seeks to further disrupt Reiner's legal significance publicly. The energy used to obscure and criminalize him is naturally magnetized or attracted to us. This energy can be captured, and if skillfully managed, can be used to increase public awareness of his existence, and significance.
Reiner Fuelmich
Remains increasingly important the longer he remains in prison for unsubstantiated reasons. His inability to be released on bond, given his visible assets and credible social connections defies logic.
Embezzlement of What? How Much To Who and How Many?
So far we don’t have a clear picture of this from authorities who in this case administrate authoritatively, but act criminally, denying release, without a clear predicate. They state no embezzlement goal, amount, or to whom. They amount to concerted efforts to silence Reiner Fuelmich, until the extreme seriousness of the charges, commensurate with continued unexplained incarceration can be more clearly defined by authorities.
Freeing Reiner
The more people who sign a petition to free Reiner obviously the more effective it will be. So I will. I’m not sure how effective letter writing to government officials is unless you are someone more significant than me and most of my friends. If a person or group, significant enough to upset criminal interests did write such a letter to the proper authorities and needed public support, that would be interesting. To mount an effective campaign to free Reiner, we must use the energy it takes to silence him which will be directed at our effective efforts to free him and draw a sharp contrast between our transparent efforts to raise issues around his captivity, and their secret reasons for unsubstantiated perpetual imprisonment.
I mean Julian Assange is being charged with crimes against the state. Reiner Fuelmich and embezzlement for an undisclosed amount have no merit whatsoever for silencing him. We don’t need to worry about embezzlement in our pushback. They created that problem for themselves to obscure his effective challenge to criminals and criminal activities organized in the system, against individuals, and now organized to silence him.
In court defense, Reiner must answer the embezzlement charges. He cannot address the charges and they cannot address them outside of court while trial is pending. This is to our advantage. The charges are likely bogus and a distraction for us. In the court of public opinion, they are not a significant threat.
We can say the charges are bogus.
We can say they couldn’t amount to the need for denial of release.
We are free to publicly laugh in their faces concerning these charges.
They must publicly defend the charges, themselves, and their extreme actions.
And for now, they are at a supreme disadvantage.
We create public cognitive dissonance around the charges to focus in on the reasons, criminal interests can and will silence any effective person, and might do so based on any number of charges.
Our cognitive dissonance tunes out the charges and allows the public to focus on the reasons why charges would be inflated against an individual effective or attempting to be influential in their community or sphere of influence, like Reiner or themselves by powerful interests. We can state Reiner’s compilation of evidence tying the upcoming WHO treaty to current criminal activity as one of many reasons and issues powerful interests would silence an effective person.
Effective people need legal recourse for effective action. Powerful criminals deny effective legal options to individuals who do not support their agenda, and Reiner has a lot of evidence outlining how this is done.
The effort to silence Reiner and the need to raise important issues is our public message/ We can state this boldly well beyond left-right party lines of political system programming. The record of indifference and ignorance of basic public policy and legal accountability evident in the responses from public officials, addressed in letters to them concerning Reiner Fuelmich, only reinforces the perception that this is about official silence and silencing investigations into criminal issues involving government officials, and not justice to a citizen and the citizens of Germany.
Think Tank Question
If 1,000 supporters had a website, with a totally transparent funding system, accounting for the use of revenue in freeing Reiner, they could access, to form-email 12 public officials in their area or country, and then published all their official responses, on the net and anywhere else, what would that do?
If the accounting of revenue to free Reiner was transparent in this effort, it would be a testimony to Reiner’s supporter’s lack of affinity to embezzlement and those who embezzle. If the form-emails and letters to officials, could be customized to briefly touch on different specific issues tied to evidence of criminality Reiner was compiling, the public would see evidence of silence and indifference to issues affecting them and decisions by powerful interests being agreed to now that will go into effect beginning early next year.
It would potentially suck money and public attention out of the contrived political machine pre-programmed solution and direct attention to concerted efforts to silence discussion and eliminate options for effective legal recourse for effective people who identify outside of the limits of the global agenda.
A better model?
This may not be the best model. It would take startup money or resource equivalent to set up the site and keep it secure for at least 12 months. Resource equivalent means people with equipment, time, and skills to devote for 12 months, based on current assets and projected assets of increased public outreach, awareness of the issues, The options for addressing those issues, and donations as a result of the site.
The goals of the model are to have the site transparently pay for itself and increase awareness of the issues and options for addressing them. The main site expense would appear to be security, for the site and backups for the site incase of a successful hack of the active site occurs. The main mission cost would be legal first, then living expenses for the site and mission operators. The goal of the model is to have expanded outreach and promotion built into the site features that are engaged when people use them on the site. People would be able to participate in form letter/email outreach and results could be easily shared on social and other media.
A successful model sucks energy out of the system and repurposes it. A mission operator will look to maximize publicly generated outreach to advance specific mission objectives. When a model proves effective it will naturally be opposed, which requires energy output from the disruptors. A mission operator will use that energy to challenge their views on important issues and increase public awareness on what they will not talk about openly
Can Reiner Fuelmich and his case be a model for public awareness and action?
If legal options for effective, honest, and productive people, outside of prevailing standards, exercised to improve those standards is important, than this case speaks to anyone with personal experience and views that challenge current convention.
Reiner Fuelmich addressed the criminal use of governments and industry, to eliminate all effective legal options, to leverage the available control of powerful interests currently influencing the economic and political system.
Reiner hasn’t done much more than a lot of other people. He compiled and organized information for the public on criminal acts in high places. But he was effective and compiled the information in a way that applied to legal human rights. His grand jury format exposed the general and specific, successful eliminations of effective legal options that had been and were in the process of being criminally authorized. As a result his name, Nuremburg 2, and grand jury, have received a lot of attention and shares on the net, and he has spoken on many forums. His mission has galvanized attention. This has made him too important as a real situation, facing anyone who wants to be able to make choices in life. So based on that, I believe their actions to stop his effective momentum for legal options, offer an opportunity for us to significantly and effectively amplify that mission, using their energy to do so.
MOVING ON To the next post.
Perception
IRUUR1 has been going on a lot about perception lately. I have been encouraging readers to observe the model of perception unique to them, that demonstrates increased perception through their increased capacity for conscious action. Successful consciousness in action can be defined as our ability to be more predictive, influential, and adaptive in life.
This is the IRUUR1 model for understanding perception.
Elsa’s is a completely different perception model and format. It helped me define perception and my unified field theory of life more clearly. Her model is motivated to seek truth, and so it is helpful to any model of perception so motivated. That is the real law of attraction in action.
So it got me thinking about how my thinking and hers were different, but helpful to me and challenged my thinking. So I wrote this comment on a restack of her post, in hopes of expanding on our shared perception of the importance of perception.
Comment
The laws of attraction and repulsion are the same. The modern interpretation does not consider how repulsion is the other half of attraction. Elsa observes shortcomings from promoted mainstream thinking about how to attract this and that. She observes the slanted mainstream perspective promoting attraction to system, and values, over a broader perspective.
But we have a different unified field theory of how life fits together, which makes my perception of why attraction is over rated and hers somewhat different.
Second. Vision and Perception complete each other. Vision without perception is a dream operating outside of and disconnected from the energy environment we call the real world. Perception is like a child tearing up the physical energy world, attracted to this and that, and creating a mess, because it has no vision.
Perception is the terrain of vision.vision
vision.vision directs perception.
Perception allows vision to be clarified, sharpened and focused in greater and greater detail for greater manifestation potential. Vision defines the perspective of our perceptions, offering models of reality pattern identification, which can be then discarded, used foundationally or incorporated more usefully in life, according to our greater skills of perception.
Elsa’s post allowed me to get a clearer perspective of the subject in my own mind and then make this comment. This post with my morning coffee was a good day starter.
If we are going to exercise our options successfully during this reset of our social order, which is under the management of a greater consciousness to remain lifestyle free, clarifying our thinking and sharing with others are a basic considerations. I believe we can discuss and develop options with impunity from now, till the next 8 or 9 months. At that time we will need to exercise all available options we have acquired to achieve independent leverage with prepared, like-minded people, to resolve what will be increasingly problematic living conditions inducing demands for government assistance from the unprepared public.
Increased understanding leading to greater perspective and perception allows us greater capacity to act on and interconnect within our unique visions.
Thanks, Elsa
elsaiselsa.substack.com/p/law-1-the-law…
ELSA - THOUGHT CREATIVITY PASSION LIFE
ASS BACKWARDS. The Law of Perception needs to be #1. NOT The Law of Attraction. THIS IS VERY IMPORTANT.
I created my own model for personal development, Full Flourishing, in good measure in response to the New Age-y mania about the Law of Attraction. Other things also did not work for me in the New Age-y approach: the stress of Finding your Vision and Living