Karen Kingston Leading By Example
IRUUR1 follows Karen Kingston
AWARENESS Karen has it. IRUUR1 has been sharing Karen since our articles the now hacked to death
http://iruur1.com
I have been writing on Substack looking for a way through the legal system to achieve human rights. Real crimes can be identified, but obvious evidence is ignored in courts. IRUUR1 has been saying the more people become familiar with the inexpensive ways to file real complaints the more the system used by the criminal elite can be overwhelmed. However, the organizations and people we have cited as offering possible mass class action legal templates, have met with limited results.
KAREN KINGSTON
We may have found a leader. One who has taken the slings and arrows or outrageous fortune, to the point of verifiable toxic warfare against her. Her expertise in toxicology and her open consultations with other subject experts are the verification required. This war on truth, by powerful vested interests. engaged in various high-stakes crimes has been compromised by her efforts.
SOYLENT GREEN
The next goal in the fight for truth, against the elite cartels of harm for profit in the world, is to establish environmental sanity over the soylent green agenda. The harm to billions of people due to outright climate fraud by the elite criminal class is right is already affecting millions of people. The fraud is richly supported by a well-documented, 160,000-year environmental data history.
THE PROBLEM
According to Dr. Lee Merritt MD,
the publishing houses of all peer review studies are owned by government intelligence. This she states began just after WWII with British intelligence MI class.
Mismanagement of Evidence
So although there is a lot of environmental science in the form of climate studies with data contrary to “official” climate models, no direct challenge to the models is cited in peer review studies. They are called discrepancies in peer-review studies, requiring further research. So this is a big problem for public awareness. Relevant scientific facts are buried in research from the public view. This has occurred with COVID and the mRNA experiment agenda, and now the Green Agenda.
The Stakes For Intelligence
Intelligence services need accurate scientific info to be discovered and published. This requires talented dedicated researchers pursuing science fact, fame, and fortune. There is no career future for researchers, to be found in challenging the owners of science publishing. Opposing green models, has many pitfalls for would-be career scholars, When those in charge of funding tell you not to openly challenge in any way, “official” soylent green climate models, your next project, depends on your continued compliance with these requests.
Another Problem THE LAWYER CLASS
Karen Kingston succeeded as a patent research expert, where the lawyer class failed. In various ways the requirements for remaining a member of the bar in good standing, compromise the ability of members of the bar, in documented cases, to argue uncompromisingly for individual rights under the Constitution. This is present-day and historical evidence, implying loyalty to an extra-constitutional authority in significant cases and minor offenses.
Her patent expertise is what overwhelmed the legal system. That and her tenacity to truth-telling. She was not alone. Dr. Malone, Alex Berenson, and other vaxx converts and natural immunity researchers helped to establish Pfizer’s liabilities. But she and others’ irrefutable data, in the form of technical patents, studies, and reports, commanded legal authority and gained loyalty in and out of the bar, resulting in standing for individual rights to sue Pfizer for damages, in court.
The Corp/Govt./Media Cone of Silence
So Karen is a standup gal. IRUUR1 wants to follow her example and mix it up with some serious medical fraud deniers in the media.
So as I am perusing this article, I stumble upon
Virus hotspots becoming more prevelant
The factors behind an increased risk in pandemics...
10 October 2023 - Interview with Peter Hotez, Baylor College of Medicine
Part of the show When not if: Preparing for the next pandemic
This is a recent interview, and you know me, I want to see how the other half lives. I want to see if these Corp/Govt./Media experts are prepared for a data debate. Alas and alack, not yet/ Chris the interviewer has apparently missed a lot of scientific information, pertinent to Dr. Hotez and his public health prescription. Dr. Peter Hotez says a number of unfounded things. Peter’s first statement in the interview is this.
This is, I believe, the start of a new normal. Covid-19 is the third major coronavirus epidemic we've had just in the last 20 years; we had SARS that arose out of Southern China in 2002, then we had Middle Eastern respiratory syndrome in 2012. That's why we started working on coronavirus vaccines, because we knew a third one was around the corner.
Medical Criminality
He is saying there was no criminality in the last pandemic and here comes another. The pharmaceutical division of the govt./corp/media health mission was anticipating a pandemic, not planning one for profit in 2019. And they are sill anticipating more pandemics.
How were and are they anticipating this we may ask. The answer is an unfounded zoonosis hypothesis. Zoonosis is known to be promoted by the official spokespersons who cite pharmaceuticals as the foundation for accomplishing the goals of the govt./corp./media, public health mission.
Dr. Hotez says in the interview;
It's hard to make a general point but one of the observations is that many of these new viruses or other pathogens are what are called zoonosis, meaning that they originate in animals. For instance, Ebola, nepovirus, coronaviruses, they all circulate in bats. And so as humans come into closer contact with bats, either because of altered climate patterns which are causing the bats to undergo new migration patterns or humans are through deforestation, urbanisation coming closer into contact with them, often through a second intermediate animal host whether it's livestock or other animals, that seems to be an important driver.
He also says because of a lack of sanitation, places like Asia and the Middle East could give rise to viruses from animals that will sweep the planet, as in the Wuhan Bat market. There has been no openly debated peer-review public discussion, allowed with competing research, linking bats to SARS or establishing zoonosis as the basis for anticipating most or any global pandemics. The contrary evidence is presented, which is ignored. Zoonosis can be naturally occurring in rare instances. It is not however because we are closer to animals than ever before. We are far removed from nature, relative to historic times. The public ignorance and omission from discussion of the lab modification evidence, in favor of zoonosis, is the result of what we might term, the govt./corp./media health mission, cone of silence. They offer evidence. Equally credentialed experts question all or parts of their data. Rather than counter their critic’s assertions, govt./corp./media health mission officials ignore the existence of relevant data and the relevance or existence of competent, credentialed critics. Some critics have even been criminalized or otherwise compromised professionally, for speaking up.
So at my level of publishing pushback, I wrote a comment challenging the lack of reporting in the interview with Dr. Hotez on THE NAKED SCIENTISTS
Medical Criminality Permalink Submitted by IRUUR1 (not verified) on Mon, 23/10/2023 - 16:36
Is Peter Hotez, and perhaps Baylor College of Medicine involved with medical criminality? A lot of evidence suggests he is It is not so much that he has a major difference of opinion with the likes of Karen Kingston, Dr Malone, and Dr. Francis. Boyle. But he ignores them completely. Dr. Boyle is a coauthor of the current US Bioweapons Treaty. He is endorsing a Ban on the Jab Resolution and has evidence substantiating it is a bioweapon. Scientists can differ. The difference of opinion proves nothing. But when dozens of equally credentialed microbiological, viral experts have a different opinion. and all you do is run and hide and ignore documented studies and data in patents outside of your public medical agenda, it is suspicious.
Unless Dr. Hotez is willing to leave the media's protective cone of silence to begin debating data outside of the official pharmaceutical agenda, everything he says is suspect and potentially criminal. Quackery and medical fraud are not confined to folk medicine and fad diets. Dr Hotez needs to come out of hiding and debate his peers.
Case In Point
A recent decision by the court established known medical harm caused by the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine. This will be the basis going forward, for individual lawsuits due to harmful side effects. This known fraud underscores the seriousness of Dr. Hotez's possible criminal involvement in vaccine promotion. He may be personally liable if he profited from fraud resulting in injury.
He has advocated the mRNA treatment for COVID for all including children. The case involved known harm to children. There is product adulteration due to unreported contaminant sequences which were part of the development process.
Karen Kingston writes; The cancerous genetic sequences are probably not just SV40 - I reported on pDNA and HeLA sequences on Oct. 20, 22021 on Brannon Howse and how they would change human DNA and cause a massive spike in very aggressive cancers with rapid tumor growth across all ages.
What’s The Point?
As a little publisher, I don’t want other little publishers just passing off boilerplate talking points in science as a predicate for journalism. So In my little way, I tell them, that we the general public are watching and paying attention to science from many credentialed sources.
It is known in advance that these questions will not be offered by publishers or answered by Dr. Hotez in an interview, yet no mention of his obvious agenda is even referred to in the interview article. This is so as not to disqualify a publication from further interviews, as journalist Derrick Broze aptly demonstrates.
Peter Hotez Questioned For the 2nd Time in Public
So the point is from wherever we are in our lives until we are ready to freely non-comply, at our individual level, with unsubstantiated mandates, we must continue to push back at our level. Make the public, wherever possible, aware that their official experts are avoiding the facts.
Karen made commenting on this interview in a science publication to the general public easy and possible by stating; …genetic sequences are probably not just SV40 - I reported on pDNA and HeLA sequences.
Nobody in the general public really knows what that means, except for hopefully, Dr. Hotez. and the folks a Naked Scientists. But it hits the label of conspiracy theory on the backside. Conspiracy theorists don’t win in court by citing evidence of pDNA and HeLa sequences. An informed public does. Conspiracy Theory is the first refuge of today’s tyrants and their profiteering minions of expertise. A few high-falluten facts that you actually do understand in context, will disarm the boilerplate fact-checkers, and impress passersby. To be clear, you need to have an idea or two about why they would run contaminant sequences in the first place and why they would withhold the results from regulators, for the magic words, pDNA and HeLa sequences to work. Especially when incanting them for passersby. But Karen explains things very well.
We hope that environmental experts and scientists with climate knowledge equal to Karen Kingstone’s medical expertise and know-how can deliver the credentialed expertise required by the public, to inform us to better respond, and to stop the harm, that is already being caused by the Soylent Green Agenda.
It's In Everything - 93 Percent Of Water Tested Found To Be Contaminated With Plastic
The Prepper shares a lot of green agenda stories after he goes after plastic nanoparticles in this video. Guaranteed to fire you up, Ladies and Gentlemen.
Clear Vision and Good Fortune All