IRUUR1’s Newsletter

Share this post

Official 5G Policies Framework, Slammed In Extensive New Study Critique

iruur1325.substack.com

Discover more from IRUUR1’s Newsletter

Science, Political Science, The Culture Of Transition
Continue reading
Sign in

Official 5G Policies Framework, Slammed In Extensive New Study Critique

The Stuff That Health Activism Is Made Of

IRUUR1
Nov 29, 2022
Share this post

Official 5G Policies Framework, Slammed In Extensive New Study Critique

iruur1325.substack.com
Share

NWON - I wanted my readers who are concerned about 5G to have this now.

Thanks for reading IRUUR1’s Newsletter! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work.

It was discovered in an article from Activist Post.

Science Journal Publishes Critique of Biased 5G Paper

The critique is an analytical study of something called, the Karipidis review. This is the basis for safety standards, currently posing as science on 5G safety-related policies.

Journal Of Exposure Science & Epidemiological Studies, Roadmaps Our 5G Risk

Wherever you are living this study is a roadmap to your greater health vs risk environment. It is all the tools you need, to begin to apply actions in civic or business decisions, without being labeled a 5G conspiracy nut, with any factual, credibility being attached to the accuser. These facts outline how much or how little and why, when considering how much or how little 5G will affect your environment.

  1. nature

  2. journal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology

  3. comment

  4. article

  • Comment

  • Open Access

  • Published: 24 November 2022

Comment on “5G mobile networks and health-a state-of-the-science review of the research into low-level RF fields above 6 GHz” by Karipidis et al.

  • Steven Weller,

  • Murray May,

  • Julie McCredden,

  • Victor Leach,

  • Dung Phung &

  • Igor Belyaev 

Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology (2022)Cite this article

  • 109 Accesses

  • 4 Altmetric

  • Metricsdetails

Karipidis et al. [1] (hereinafter: Karipidis) published a scoping review investigating radiofrequency (RF) studies in the range >6 GHz, with a particular focus on the millimetre wave (MMW) band. The Karipidis review was performed against a backdrop of rising public concerns associated with the health and safety of 5th generation (5G) wireless technology [2]. Subsequently, the telecommunications industry is now using the Karipidis review to suggest “no evidence of adverse health effects from the radio waves used in 5G including mmWave” [3]. Notwithstanding the fact that no studies have investigated specific 5G frequencies and modulations, does the Karipidis review stand up to scrutiny in providing assurances of safety (no evidence of harm) that industry is suggesting? The analysis herein reveals that it does not.

Read On

Enjoy a festive eggnog. Snuggle up with the critique on your screen, look it over, and get to know it. It’s really kinda warm and fuzzy inside, once you get to know it. It just takes a little time. But if you give it a chance, you’ll see, it will be your friend and servant in life, for both you and your community.

To help this study along are two faithful companions. They will likely be joined by others soon. They are; our new literary friends, coming to us by way of;

The Oceana Radiofrequency Scientific Advisory Association

OCEANIA RADIOFREQUENCYSCIENTIFIC ADVISORY ASSOCIATION (ORSAA)
  • Welcome

  • About Us

  • Team

  • Resources

  • Contact

  • Donate

  • Log In

INTRODUCING

A critical analysis of Karipidis 5G Health Review

​Paper Reviewed: 5G mobile networks and health—a state-of-the-science review of the research into low-level RF fields above 6 GHz by Karipidis et.al.

ORSAA Supplementary Experimental Table Final [12-08-2022] : Download below

review_of_karipidis_5g_experimental_tables[09-08-2022].pdf

Download File

JOINED BY THE IRREPRESSIBLE


ORSAA Supplementary Epidemiological Table Final [12-08-2022] : Download below

review_of_karipidis_5g_epidemiological_table_[12-08-22].pdf

Download File

The analysis and supplemental will back up everything the Journal Of Exposure Science & Epidemiological Studies, 5G analysis concludes.

IS 5G BAD?

Who knows? And that’s really the problem, isn’t it? Without isolating 5G from other harmful factors to greater and lesser degrees in communities where people live, work and travel with informed consent on the science, we have nothing to study.

This Study Concludes, A Little 5G, A little At A Time, May Go A Long Way

It doesn’t outright say you will be harmed by any 5G exposure. But outright 5G saturation Sucks. It is 100% guaranteed to inflict harm to a greater or lesser degree if it is mass introduced under present guidelines. Now we have to determine how much 5G exposure, given our current living environment is actually potentially useful, or harmful where we live and work.

This study critique, along with the 2 backup companions, will give anyone with a basic understanding of them, leverage to influence their environment, in any family, civic, or business situation.

Thanks for reading IRUUR1’s Newsletter! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work.

Share this post

Official 5G Policies Framework, Slammed In Extensive New Study Critique

iruur1325.substack.com
Share
Comments
Top
New
Community

No posts

Ready for more?

© 2023 IRUUR1
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start WritingGet the app
Substack is the home for great writing