The Covid-19 Genetic Solstice, A Decisive Turning Point
Covid-19- Reported to contain numerous, genetic strains, spliced together, developed, and leaked from a lab(s)
The evidence of covid-19 as a manmade virus began appearing earlier this year. Since then the corroboration only got more intense, as various doctors, morticians, virologists, etc., weighed in with their findings. In the last several weeks, the outcry among those who are daily, painstaking, and with significant risk, if they are wrong, reporting on it, has taken a more desperate tone.
Immediate Decisions In The Absence Of Debate
If the evidence pointing to a manmade virus, developed with military capabilities from various genetic strains, purposely, is true, could be an honest mistake. If it was released purposely, to institute harmful, experimental injections, with genetic process-altering implications, it is negligent, or willful genocide for profit. These are serious charges, backed by credible evidence from credible expert sources, doctors, researchers, and professionals.
In short, the entire basis of scientific, peer review, field data, research, and debate, as the government’s gold standard for public policy, has been replaced with something else. Official silence, disdain when approached with evidence, and threats of ramifications resulting from going against official “health and science”, policies, too fanatically. Debate is a waste of time, your evidence is incomplete, and you are irrelevant if you expect officials to take you seriously. Now please, stop harping on the subject, or take the consequences.
MSM reporting on the development of covid-19 as a means to release a harmful agent-for-profit and deliberate genocide is not allowed as well. Some of their opinion shows, that present volumes of evidence, and highly credentialed experts, on covid-18 never find their way to the so-called “objective” news desk, of the outlet, for mainstream news reporting and analysis. You will get the Republican/Democrat, Left/Right View, but never hear highly credentialed experts, weighing in with peer review evidence and field data, pointing to deliberate harm inflicted on the public, through covid-19 development and release.
Covid-19 Origins, Official Position | Lab or Nature?
There is one. You can find it;
Here.
Access keysNCBI HomepageMyNCBI HomepageMain ContentMain Navigation
Search PMC Full-Text Archive
Search in PMC
Run this search in PubMed
J Med Life. 2021 Jan-Feb; 14(1): 118–120.
PMCID: PMC7982270
PMID: 33767796
SARS-COV-2 as an artificial creation: scientific arguments and counterarguments
Shermaine Yee,1 Ching Siang Tan,2,* Abdullah Khan,2 Kah Seng Lee,3 Bey Hing Goh,4 and Long Chiau Ming5,*
Author information Article notes Copyright and License information Disclaimer
Their conclusion is, Sars-Cov-2 not manmade, but Covid-19 is not mentioned separately.
In conclusion, all these specific features observed in SARS-COV-2 helps scientists to rule out the idea that this pandemic caused by the novel coronavirus is the result of a man-made action that could be either engineered in the laboratory or further created as a bioweapon out of conspiracy. Recent discoveries revealed evidence of the presence of the virus around the world before it emerged in Asia.
_________________*-|||-*_________________
What Is Not Included In Their Conclusion
Their reasoning seems to be if we conclude that Sars-Covid-2 was not manmade, then of course covid-19 isn’t either. This omits all evidence specific to Covid-19, which is up for debate.
Evidence of lab signatures relating to gain of function, and genetic splicing
Evidence of artificial chimeric formulation from over two dozen different origins.
a. chimeric
Listen to pronunciation
(ky-MEER-ik)
Having parts of different origins…. contains cells with different genes
Paper trail of collaboration between public officials, the military, the government, and privately funded labs, along with drug companies in research and development related specifically to Covid-19, including a gain of function research, and other development.
The Geno-Side
Those who point to willful genocide as the motive, present evidence of the core involvement of the eugenics movement in the formation of technocracy in general, and the health policies now in place. Bill Gates is notable today, among many more in history.
OAN is an MSM news outlet, with an “official” reporting-oriented “desk of official objectivity” One of their opinion shows, however, was allowed to take on this likely life or death subject, with a fill-in host, while the main host was away.
Stew Peters on OAN: COVID-19 is a AI Biosynthetic Parasitic Technology, IT'S NOT A VIRUS
Perhaps no one has been more successful at compiling the data around the components of the virus and vaccine than Stew Peters. His primary reporters on the subject, are themselves doctors and researchers, seized by the urgency of the situation. They have been compiling data and evidence from around the world, in the field, the lab, from peer-review literature, backed by credentialed data and interviews with credentialed experts for news reports, to discuss on Stew’s show.
In this Focus interview, Stew mentions a number of them and their work. Their evidence has led him, and now many others, to conclude, that genocide is the motive. His conclusion is solidified by the continued silence and unwillingness of officials to debate, what appears to be an equally credentialed argument while overseeing demonstrably harmful, potentially genocidal Covid-19 and mRNA drug, policies.
Standing In The Face Of No Debate
No one said self-sufficiency and independence in life, in, or apart from, any system was easy. If it was, everyone would be doing it. But it gets easier for more people as more people exercise reason in their judgments, and insist on verifying harmless intentions, in agreements, with one another.
Shedding, And The Personal Debate Window, Decision Timeline
Conclusive evidence proves that intimate contact of non-mRNA-injected people with those injected, sheds the genetic effect of creating the spike protein in the treated individual, to the nontreated individual. It is possible then, over time, if the shedding effects do not wear off and enough people are mRNA treated, “vaccinated people could overwhelm the contact environment and alter, potentially for the worse the entire genome of humanity. Unless there is a willingness to debate, we naturally assume the worse.
So the timeline for a debate is not long and will only be lengthened by our willingness to bone up on all the available info from all sides, and debate with each other with enough honesty and energy to force official engagement, either willingly or unwillingly. Civically, civilly or criminally, adversarialy.