Let’s discuss the control of knowledge and the obscuring of our human story. First, there’s the control of knowledge. Control of knowledge is a matter that relies on funding and public distribution of information and available evidence. Evidence continues to mount that someone somewhere controls the funding and distribution of knowledge. In science, if you want to publish scientific papers, you must be careful in each one you publish, not to say certain things, and to reinforce any relevant aspects within an officially authoritative prevailing narrative about your subject in each paper you publish.,
We see mounting evidence of a powerful prevailing authority controlling knowledge through funding and distribution of climate information that conflicts with the green agenda. Here is evidence that there are also rules on how old our species and our human civilizations are.
Modern humans are characterized by specialized hand morphology that is associated with advanced manipulative skills.
CONTROL OF KNOWLEDGE
The study looked at the fingerbones of every possible ape and human ancestor they could find and compared them to the 1,800,000-year-old fingerbone. Then they compared the ancient finger to a modern finger bone and found the modern and ancient fingerbone to be virtually the same.
Our Species officially Only Goes Back A Few Hundred Thousand Years
The paper in so many words, also says that the researchers cannot conclusively classify it as a nearly 2 million-year-old human fingerbone because officially, our species doesn’t go back that far. The paper is then relegated to the unexplained category of science, with further research required. Unexplained science does not normally get the same funding as science that fits the government and corporate agendas. But, what funding is available for further research helps the authors of the paper get more work. The researchers may get some of that research money because they did not challenge the official academic narrative in their paper.
This one study might not be much of a discussion were it not for the fact that the study is one of many pieces of “unexplained” scientific archaeological evidence, of the existence of humans like ourselves, going as far back as 800 million years
It is one of many examples of such evidence cited in this 2-year-old video.
Is this evidence of an attempt to control the human story? And if so,
How can we empower the scientific community to protect and expand their research, funding, and distribution of evidence currently outside of public view?
How important is the knowledge of our past to us today?
Who controls the information?
Is controlling the human story and climate science narrative part of the same agenda?
Share this post
Controlling The Language Of Knowledge - Our Human Story
Share this post
Let’s discuss the control of knowledge and the obscuring of our human story. First, there’s the control of knowledge. Control of knowledge is a matter that relies on funding and public distribution of information and available evidence. Evidence continues to mount that someone somewhere controls the funding and distribution of knowledge. In science, if you want to publish scientific papers, you must be careful in each one you publish, not to say certain things, and to reinforce any relevant aspects within an officially authoritative prevailing narrative about your subject in each paper you publish.,
We see mounting evidence of a powerful prevailing authority controlling knowledge through funding and distribution of climate information that conflicts with the green agenda. Here is evidence that there are also rules on how old our species and our human civilizations are.
Earliest modern human-like hand bone from a new >1.84-million-year-old site at Olduvai in Tanzania
Manuel Domínguez-Rodrigo,
Travis Rayne Pickering,
Sergio Almécija,
Jason L. Heaton,
Enrique Baquedano,
Audax Mabulla &
David Uribelarrea
Nature Communications volume 6, Article number: 7987 (2015) Cite this article
20k Accesses
46 Citations
434 Altmetric
Metricsdetails
Abstract
Modern humans are characterized by specialized hand morphology that is associated with advanced manipulative skills.
CONTROL OF KNOWLEDGE
The study looked at the fingerbones of every possible ape and human ancestor they could find and compared them to the 1,800,000-year-old fingerbone. Then they compared the ancient finger to a modern finger bone and found the modern and ancient fingerbone to be virtually the same.
Our Species officially Only Goes Back A Few Hundred Thousand Years
The paper in so many words, also says that the researchers cannot conclusively classify it as a nearly 2 million-year-old human fingerbone because officially, our species doesn’t go back that far. The paper is then relegated to the unexplained category of science, with further research required. Unexplained science does not normally get the same funding as science that fits the government and corporate agendas. But, what funding is available for further research helps the authors of the paper get more work. The researchers may get some of that research money because they did not challenge the official academic narrative in their paper.
This one study might not be much of a discussion were it not for the fact that the study is one of many pieces of “unexplained” scientific archaeological evidence, of the existence of humans like ourselves, going as far back as 800 million years
It is one of many examples of such evidence cited in this 2-year-old video.
Inexplicable Artifacts - Michael Cremo, Forbidden Archeology
The DemystifySci Podcast
Some DISCUSSION Points
Is this evidence of an attempt to control the human story? And if so,
How can we empower the scientific community to protect and expand their research, funding, and distribution of evidence currently outside of public view?
How important is the knowledge of our past to us today?
Who controls the information?
Is controlling the human story and climate science narrative part of the same agenda?
Thank You