6 Comments

If there was a massive and hidden cosmic disaster imminent why would the cabal need to starve us, poison us and reduce population if that's going to happen anyways. js

Expand full comment
author

The cabal goal for the human population, openly published, is 1 billion for environmental sustainability. . I don't know how aware of the 12,000-year climate cycle you are. Our science in the Safe Zone Newsletter sees evidence of a major climate shift in 25-30 years. That will easily reduce the world's population to 1 billion, or less all by itself, given present awareness levels of the event's potential, affecting the lack of prep for it. Perhaps they are preparing for it. The 12,000-year drastic climate event is not refuted but confirmed. But our timeline is a hypothesis, not refuted, but ongoing as these discoveries are new. So let's put it aside and go with what we know.

We lose electricity in 30 years from Carrington or a major CME event for sure. Likely within 12 years. Maybe this solar max. our field is getting weak. This is an outside bet on population control then, for the cabal. They don't want to wait around. They will likely have some or a lot of shielding we may not be aware of for their stuff. But they want to start reducing the population now because the digital currency system itself can only support so many people for so long before it stops handing out free stuff to everyone. So that's why the wars WWIII threat, food/energy shortages, poison medicine, etc.

The green agenda appears to be a way to justify reducing population, under the pretext of science.

To me, the Carrington event and our vulnerability to solar flaring due to magnetic field weakness expose the science farce that is the cabal and puts their fundamental lack of self-proclaimed, science/economic advancement in the public interest, on urgent display as a fraud. It is a dead certain event they will not address. If they address it, they risk opening the debate of their phony green science and begin talking about solar forcing and space weather as significant climate factors. This they cannot do. If they don't address electrical vulnerabilities in their tech plan,, with increased public awareness of the danger, they increasingly look like a cabal, and not a legitimate public interest.

So thanks for sharing the article. They and their science are weak and sick, but we are getting stronger as we apply science to the truth.

Expand full comment

I come from a Young Earth perspective, so when i hear 12,000 yrs *anything* i am extremely skeptical.

Expand full comment
author

I totally understand. Honestly, it has taken me almost 3 maybe a bit over,3 years to finally come around. I will do my best to publish accurate science, history, etc. on the magnetic excursion and our probable timeline, to keep educating myself, and try to explain how the evidence works and how the pieces fit.

I appreciate your comment and hope you will continue to monitor my efforts.

Expand full comment

I will! I understand those of us who follow the "Creationist" theory of everything are a minority in the truther community and the world-at-large. No one has all the answers. I follow a lot of researchers and journalists who do not share my viewpoint and still learn, A LOT.

Thank you for tolerating my opinion expressed as such.

Expand full comment

Thank you for writing this. It needed to be written. I was going to write it but, now that you have done such a great job, I don't need to write it. I will just suggest others read it. It has been cross referenced to Solution Seeking subscribers as shown below in the quotes. Thanks again.

"

I am thankful for this well written article. I was thinking of writing something similar. But this author has done a much better job than I would have. Does this tie in with why the enemy cabal is acting the way it is? Can this be useful in Solution Seeking, strategic analysis, and strategic planning? Does how the enemy is preparing for this (DUMBs, etc.) indicate enemy vulnerabilities and/or things we might want to discuss? Thank you.

"

Expand full comment