Molecular A.I.? Practical Limits Of Current A.I., In A Cyclically Mutational Environment
ICENI gets nitty gritty with the machine, while we speak to each other on the same subjects without knowing what to say or how to act.
I wanted to share a great post with you and offer some thoughts on the subject.
This article is shared by Larry Druhall, in his Solution Seeking newsletter.
ICENI Bulletins
A Third Talk With ChatGPT
It pretty much admits everything
Revisiting the Issue of Human Augmentation
A couple days ago, I had another conversation with ChatGPT and got it to admit some rather stunning things. I posted a partial version of this convo on Twitter and it received quite a bit of interest.
Granted, every reply from this language model should be taken with a grain of salt, for a number of reasons. AIs are prone to hallucinations; if they don’t have a valid answer, they will make one up from scratch. They’re also highly motivated to mirror your questions as much as possible.
However, these AIs are trained on massive data sets that often include information that matches the query, including the contents of peer-reviewed scientific articles and other highly technical publications.
With that in mind, let’s see what the AI had to say when further pressed about IoB tech. Again, Midjourney was used for the images.
Nano Networks in the Body
augmented blood vessels (nanobots inside the veins --v 5)
Spartacus: What are intra-body nano-networks?
ChatGPT: Intra-body nano-networks are a concept in the field of nanotechnology that involves creating networks of nanoscale devices or nanoparticles within the human body to perform various tasks, such as monitoring, diagnosis, and treatment of diseases. These tiny, interconnected devices can work together to provide real-time communication, data transmission, and coordinated responses to specific biological signals or stimuli. The idea is to leverage the potential of nanotechnology to improve healthcare and the overall quality of human life.
Some potential applications of intra-body nano-networks include:
Targeted drug delivery: Nanoparticles can be engineered to carry and release specific drugs directly to the affected area in the body, minimizing side effects and improving the drug's efficacy.
Health monitoring: Nano-sensors can be embedded within the body to continuously monitor vital signs, such as blood pressure, glucose levels, and heart rate, and send this information to healthcare providers or devices.
Disease diagnosis: Intra-body nano-networks can potentially identify diseases at their earliest stages by detecting biomarkers or other molecular signatures, allowing for more effective and timely treatment.
Regenerative medicine: Nanotechnology can be used to stimulate the growth of new tissues and organs, repair damaged cells, and enhance the body's natural healing processes.
Brain-computer interfaces: Intra-body nano-networks could facilitate direct communication between the brain and external devices, allowing for more efficient control of prosthetic limbs or other assistive technologies.
While intra-body nano-networks hold great promise, there are still many challenges that need to be addressed before they can be widely implemented, including biocompatibility, long-term safety, and ethical considerations. Nonetheless, researchers continue to explore the possibilities of this emerging field, aiming to develop new solutions for improving human health and well-being.
Spartacus: Some papers indicate that researchers have done path loss calculations for in-body plasmonic nanoantennas that would allow Terahertz-frequency RF to be channeled through adipose tissue.
ChatGPT: You are correct. There have been studies on using plasmonic nanoantennas for wireless communication within the human body, specifically focusing on Terahertz (THz) frequency bands. The Terahertz frequency range, lying between the microwave and infrared bands, has attracted attention for its potential applications in intra-body nano-networks.
Adipose tissue (body fat) is relatively transparent to Terahertz waves, making it a suitable medium for in-body communication. Plasmonic nanoantennas are designed to confine and manipulate electromagnetic waves at the nanoscale, enabling efficient communication through the adipose tissue.
In these studies, researchers have carried out path loss calculations to understand the propagation and attenuation of Terahertz waves within the body. Path loss is a critical parameter in wireless communication, as it helps determine the signal strength, quality, and reliability of communication…
I hope I’m not upsetting ICENI by including so much of their article content in this article. You got to read it. It goes on and on, much to my delightful resistance. I had had enough at different times during the article, but the scope of intellect and awareness of the technical underpinnings of our systematic control compelled ce to new article insights, all the way through. IT’S LONG and captivating. And freeing as well, all in one handy dandy body of content. So I mean, what could go wrong? A Third Talk With ChatGPT
Speaking Of A.I. Control, Relative to the ChatGPT article
I am going to go out on a half-learned limb and perhaps coin a phrase I could not find on Google. Prismatic Logic. And I further, rather ignorantly based on lay scientific exuberance, assert that A.I. to be of effective practical use in an electromagnetic universe, requires more than current machine learning to surpass human potential. It requires it to develop prismatic logic, we have already pre-installed in our genome as currently operational. This is based on what I view as the anomalous, nature of the universe. A primary controlling mechanism induced by fear influences our negotiating our need to survive against our need to evolve. This anomalous math of the universe gives us endless mutational possibilities, across infinite time.
A.I. Is Subject To The Laws Of Energy
What I am suggesting is that in a universe of endless slightly very different, mutational possibilities, A.I. is already obsolete, in as much as it can only predict and analyze based on past mutational parameters ro form possibilities. In our solar system for instance, on earth, every 12,000 years, a major mutational, or extinction event occurs, where our planet the other planets, and the sun experience a wave from the galaxy that induces a magnetic excursion. On earth, our magnetic field goes down to nearly 0, always under 10% of full strength. This allows tons of radiation into our cellular structure and the formational structure of all species. A few species go extinct, and all are altered in some way, in various degrees of significance.
There is a lot of interdisciplinary science from astrophysical to archeological, indicating we are in a magnetic excursion cycle now. Our magnetic poles are shifting, that's one indicator, and our magnetic field strength is down at least 25% from the peak normal 1,000 years ago., a significant indicator. If our A.I. does not have the molecular code of the galaxy, upon which all cellular, and galactic formation, including galactic wave structures is programmed into our A.I., wiring ourselves to anything like what is being researched now, could make us obsolete over time, near or long term.
Current Machine Learning Limits and What We Need
Computing the mutational possibilities, contained in the molecular code of the galaxy would require, A.I. to have a sort of prismatic logic, with which to analyze the facets of mutational structural potentials, in an electromagnetic environment, governing our biological mutation.
Our real-time A.I. contraption may need to be a living molecular computer organism, embodying a form of intelligence, synchronized with the galactic clock, programmed to organically adjust our genome s we see fit, and machine-learn the molecular code of the universe, forming the laws of all galaxy conde formation,
Am I wrong? What would our A.I. chat friends say? Would they laugh me off the logic game board?
Other than that, this is a stunning article. So challenging for me. I do not understand all the science and all the terms, but I have read about nanotech, understand its implications saw familiar terms, and found new ones, I was able to grasp new terms and this increased my understanding of the nano-mechanics of our biology.
I don’t think we can control but we can resolve our place in existence, as one proven part of the primary substance of Creation evident in nature.
PURE SCIENCE AND ONLY THE PURE SCIENCE, GUARANTEED, Tested under lab conditions
When we are talking about changing our genetics, and our biology, we can now rely on the proven biological maxim, established by Kary Mullis, inventor of the PCR, that all of nature, comes from one substance, yet to be defined, but mappable at least to a degree, using PCR. PCR is used to find a bit of anything in existence, that will be always found in any other thing in existence, in various proportions. If A.I. can machine learn this and applied to molecular code structure, we're in GMO heaven.
A Chat with a Person
Wrote a comment on our recent post, Global Reset Moves Forward 600bil Ticks, IN ONE MONTH
Now everyone should understand clearly WHY GLOBAL DEPOPLATION and TRANSHUMANIST AGENDAS are in place and action and why the elite who want to remain all powerful and in total wealth and control want to LITERALLY MONITOR and capitalize and profit from all our bodily functions and all the we consume and use, TO KEEP THEIR DEBT BASED GAME GOING. Only the much larger population ELIMINATING THEM will stop this , everyone seems afraid to say this . Show me any other viable solution.
Making Me Think
Thomas is always to the point and makes me think. Unfortunately, because of my abstract logic wiring, I always think about what I think about, in terms of most like, least like, if this is first what is the most likely picture, of the next 3 pictures in order. That kind of stuff. Therefore I rely on people like Guitarman to keep me on point and remind me to think about things like if anything I do or think about, really matters, as we sit here and read today. Does anything matter if we don’t actively change matter and find a way to make it matter, as much as possible? This would have been a comment but it got too long for the IRUUR1 comment section.
IRUUR1 comment
Everyone should re-read Dune again. "Fear is the mind-killer" Don't know if you've read it. It was a major cultural influence from the late sixties through the 80s. I can't believe that a book with such influence could have been read by so many people who appear to have missed the main point of the novel and failed to attempt to incorporate this fact about fear into their lives.
We probably are not allowed to see examples, of the kind of courage we seek in the MSM or even the politically financed alt media.
Or as I considered in my Madison Ave. approach to marketing natural law, acts of courage may be labeled as other things, in the examples shown in media. Examples presented well outside of the focus on the systematic lifestyle control agenda attack on the public. We seek more courage in numbers.
Trivia
I saw an example of personal courage in an artist, whose name I don’t remember as I write, in a movie with the name somma in it somewhere. So it didn't sell me. It is a scary movie. It was an article to promote the movie posted on Fox digital. The point is she self-abused herself to get what she thought was a breakthrough personal performance milestone for her. She knows herself or sees herself as ultimately the arbiter of her personal condition. So she doesn't care what she did harmlessly to others, but not herself, get what she was looking for. She is very literate about the inner confusion and panic and guilt, about her self-abuse, for one role, then before the movie is done, she has to abandon everything about herself as that person to prepare for a new role. I know she’s promoting the movie, but I also know from knowing actors, that doing this kind of transition thing to be believable, close up on camera, makes you focus on not losing who you are in essence. Your essential matter, from which these iterations come from
Tell me if I'm wrong, but I see my role in prep for a self-reliant lifestyle as a form of self-abuse, as I weed through my life, abandoning conveniences and comfort in the process. Getting off of a govt pension. When this role is over, I will begin a new character of myself, and perform to the best of my ability in a new role in a more rural setting.
Application
Does the actress know what we know and will be our self-reliant neighbor in a few years, pitching in? Not likely, but others with the courage to routinely re-invent themselves to serve a greater purpose will likely be there. Because they have the most potential to be there.
The actor's goal appears to be, to achieve a position of freedom in the system. Mine is to achieve a position of stability in resolution outside of the system. If the actor doesn't re-invent properly, they may never work in this town again. Her politics are likely the politics of the people who tell her she's great, and further her goals. WHY THE HELL AM I LABORING THIS POINT?
Because reinventing yourself is the evolution part, and being able to tell people, without freaking them out is the survival part, of our anomaly, manipulated under good and evil.
The more I write now, the more I see your point Guitarman; everyone seems afraid to say what they know. Being able to say it clearly may be a viable solution.
Difficulty in speaking
The need to re-invent is evidently a prime motivational force in personal and species evolution, Anyone successful in one way or another does this in one way or another. But the Unknown numbers of us speaking openly about our lifestyle as a forced revolutionary act meant to inspire others to defy, by being self-reliant from a destructive system, are buried or silent. Probably silent through fear. If we could all speak up more we would anchor this personal re-invention as a public idea for action with considerable force and influence.
Reasons we don't speak up
The most common I see in media, de-programming people like myself and programmed persons I know is this. Desire to re-invent themselves as freely as limits allow, while still functioning to some capacity in the system. Speaking out will affect their ability to quietly act in their favor. I think this is happening on a mass scale. Most are still loyal to the system. Many however see the system as a crutch, to help them get real assets, to become more self-reliant.
One or two, or a family of them may be our neighbors soon.
Your Points
Many in both of these categories of the aware of the system who either are loyal or see it as a temporary crutch are less likely aware that, GLOBAL DEPOPLATION and TRANSHUMANIST AGENDAS are in place. More are fully aware that there is an elite class who want to remain all-powerful and in total wealth and control. People see monitoring but are not sure how to what extent the elite, currently do and have the plans to LITERALLY MONITOR and capitalize and profit from all our bodily functions and all we consume and use, Some are partially aware of most or some of these things.
Breakdown
My breakdown is; Almost everyone on earth is aware of an all-powerful elite vying for control of everyone, in a global system. A slim few have become comfortable in their minds, or see the policies already in place leading to total GMO rights, over planetary human resources, in an elite, controlled, and managed system. Perhaps around 50%, over and under several points or so, understand the economic control factors in play. but know powerful people are often not accountable.
This is a breakdown, in a sense, of public awareness of a system, which makes them afraid to speak clearly. Speaking up means transecting lines of political and economic force with a clarity that cannot be disrupted by artificial energy barriers.
Our Enemy Is Our Vortex
The system is a vortex of our own creation. It is the waste bin of our species, nicely governed under the Law, in resonance with our desires. What belongs there will go there.
Why a waste bin, not a resource? In my view, our species is passing through our earth’s approx. 12,000-year, environmental housecleaning process, active throughout the solar system. This is called a magnetic excursion. We're instinctively creating and tossing what we don't need into the bin, and moving on. There is a lot of energy in there. Together, for better or worse, we are married together in an ordinary evolutionary pattern of our being here in existence.
Fear Factor
Because we to greater or lesser degrees are unable to form a common language to express these ideas, according to our awareness among ourselves, we all to one degree or another contribute to the lack of development by individual acts of forced cowardice through caution in our words. Many words are censored and criminalized, which have inherently innocent definitions. This increases the fear of attempting to create a common language.
Vortex Intelligence, Evidence of a Plan
So I have this evidence-based theory of a vortex, in an energy environment. Well and good. But your other essential point must be addressed. Our vortex is intelligently driven, by all evidence, to systematically force me to lose control of my personal biology, in an era of likely magnetic excursion and species mutation on earth, An event that gets rid of and/ or repurposes the energies found in the vortex. And that this matrix of energy, in the vortex is systematically, intelligently attacking my ability to survive, by limiting my survival options, through publicly allowed environmental toxification. And it gains greater power by our silence, and our continued use of debt notes, for our existence.
The intelligence knows the Law as I do, that the spoken word is the first primal point of influence in the biology of our species, and by all evidence, this intelligence systematically influences speech by every means possible. The plan I see evidenced now is to manipulate speech and actions by increasing our fear of each other, to hold and or increase loyalty to the system, before the economic/political crash/reset.
Fumbling For Words
What you and I and Larry, and those we share are trying to do I think is develop our own language to pass through the lines of force in the matrix, formed by the primal good/evil doctrine, based on our species animally between aligning survival with evolution.
Good and evil produce the prismatic iterations of political, religious, and other doctrines, based on our belief in good and evil. These have led to the economic, social, entertainment programs, and others being intelligently designed to draw all life, into the lines of force in the matrix, now governing the waste bin vortex. It is either instinctually driven intelligence we create, under laws of natural intelligence formation we do not see at present. Or it is intelligence that sees our vortex, and forms the matrix made up of our energy, outside our species, as many stories say, and that they influence our affairs cyclically.
Survival Rate
Because our species always survive these events, we can choose survival over extinction, by getting small as they did and ignoring the rest, if all our interconnecting efforts have failed. Permaculture may offer a remedy, for systems of natural re-purpose of toxins in the soil, and ways of filtering water., without the need for electricity, as we use it now. We may have the kind of tech in organic lifestyles offering solutions or developing them. Anything anyone knows about good links to this kind of information will be welcomed in comments,(no ads please) and revolutionary. No one on earth may even need to worry about toxins in 30 years if the environmental changes of this 12,000-year cycle are in line with Suspicious Observer's timeline.
Survival language
Our language, which we are developing, revolves around words and deeds, difficult to systematically control. As we use these media system programs and platforms to resolve matrix lines of speech to speak together and perhaps influence our kind in our language, we are also by our actions words, and deeds looking to find the proper intersections for information transactions in the matrix while avoiding the junk-tures, programmed into the system.
Weekend Fun With Good And Evil
It’s the weekend, so lighten up. Can we have fun with good, evil, crazed science, and political correctness? By all evidence you can as witnessed in The Tick, Created by Ben Edlund. It is one of the stupidest smart farces ever conceived and is an IRUUR1modern classic cartoon recommendation. It survived 3 seasons of Saturday morning cartoon, major and independent programming.
Following in the Warner Brothers, and the Rocky and Bullwinkle style of very adult speak in a child-safe format. It was created to make fun of all cultural assumptions, spending time looking at the politics of technachracy.
Here are 2 good ones back to back.
The Tick : S01 E01 - The Tick vs The Idea Men
The Tick : S01 E03 - The Tick vs Dinosaur Neil
It is a good example of observing and laughing at an intricate array of junctures in the matrix while identifying intersections in our common reasoning, made for laughs.
A Tick In The System
It’s a language. I considered The Tick an attempt at the time it was on TV, to use the system to inject increasingly outlawed conversation into it, to trigger a positive transformation of the system. And to some extent, it has been used as a lighthearted escape by many, to see somewhat outside of system parameters, on things influencing peoples thinking.
Excellent , now we are dealing with great minds on the following paragraph YOU WROTE I will comment
Survival Rate
Because our species always survive these events, we can choose survival over extinction, by getting small as they did and ignoring the rest, if all our interconnecting efforts have failed. Permaculture may offer a remedy, for systems of natural re-purpose of toxins in the soil, and ways of filtering water., without the need for electricity, as we use it now. We may have the kind of tech in organic lifestyles offering solutions or developing them. Anything anyone knows about good links to this kind of information will be welcomed in comments,(no ads please) and revolutionary. No one on earth may even need to worry about toxins in 30 years if the environmental changes of this 12,000-year cycle are in line with Suspicious Observer's timeline.
I have lived off grid, outside the system, self employed , highly skilled ,self sufficient , perma-culture , and highly warrior /scholar trained LIFESTYLE my entire life. I did not see it as a self induced type of "abuse" to detach from the system, BUT as the FOUNDATIONAL way to be most free of it , as healthy as possible , AND the solution to creating the new and better world on the other side of it. I did this BECAUSE I ALREADY saw these negative future timelines as the most likely probability IN MY LIFETIME, , even as a young child. Looking in hindsight I see my entire life has been TRAINING for these times as well as the solution. So it is a great time to be ALIVE and a" good day to die " THOUGH I dont intend to, today or anytime soon in the future , that is the BALANCE we must live NOW. PLEASE send and or use everywhere .
I want to thank IRUUR1 and Thomas Guitarman for what they have done up to now. My computer says NOW is Sun Apr 2 1:15 PM US Western Time (Seattle time).
I want to share another perspective, another way of looking at things, another way of being. A story of my distant past will be used to introduce it.
As a pre teenager, around the age of 12, I was a distance runner, lived in Calgary Canada, and loved the wild Banff National Park system to the west. I would run the park trails, going further into the wild than my parents allowed. The further I got from people, the more the energy changed. At times I would come to a fork in the trail. I use the word trail loosely, usually there was nothing like a well groomed human trail. I used to love to consider where the different paths might lead, go down all of them for a while, return back to the fork, and explore the others. But time was always a factor. Eventually I had to choose one, and hope that maybe at some future time I could return to this fork and, either re walk this path, or explore the other paths more deeply.
That has stuck with me. My engineering career in simulations was extremely successful. My simulations were accurate, and I developed tuning programs to ensure the greatest possible accuracy. I also learned to creatively visualize several different futures. But I have been doing this my entire life.
So, when Guitarman talks of his success and experiences in his life choices, I have already walked that path to the greatest extent possible without actually having done it. Several times in my past I seriously considered doing what Guitarman did. Physically, in this life, one chooses one path, and can only visualize the others. Spiritual guidance and lucid dreams indicate that, for me, doing this is my purpose here. It comes at a cost, but has benefits.
I admire those who have a proven ability to select the best path and excel at it. Usually I discover that they are also adept at looking at different paths, but with more well defined goals, with more well defined destinations, while rejecting the others, and focusing on what is most relevant to them.
And I could go on with this, but would prefer to stop now and invite discussion. We can learn by sharing. Each have their own attributes and way of being. I had always hoped to be able to walk the kind of nature embracing permaculture path Guitarman walked, and chose to defer that until later in life, and now it looks like that might not manifest.
For me, the pivotal concept here is the choice of path, and focus. We are all challenged right now by an enemy that has designs for the future that are not in accordance with what we believe in? An enemy with what appears to be superior resources. An enemy which appears to have the ability to force its visions upon any or all of us in any way it wishes any time it wishes. In Solution Seeking, this publication was an attempt to derive humanity's best chance of stopping this enemy's ability to harm humanity and the planet, It gave the simplest possible quantitative method for evaluating options I know of and presented my analysis of 6 alternatives that, for me, span the spectrum of the solutions I have seen so far. It concluded that the best solution at this time is to do our best to get people thinking of root cause solutions, strategic analysis, and planning, and attempt to get people invoking as many viable solutions as possible, with the greatest urgency and focus possible. https://solutionseeking.substack.com/p/web-links-of-interest-march-28-2023 Great? No. It appears to have failed. So far I am not aware of one person who has read that, done their own analysis, and discussed it. Nobody has offered suggestions for better ways to do it. But many have told me that they are smarter than the rest and know what to do, because they have always succeeded in the past, and, therefore, they are correct. The problem is that all of those things, many said in confidence, are not compatible with what the others have so authoritatively said is the best answer. People prefer to show their successes and continue to jump from one publication to another showing how the enemy is planning and doing even worse things.
I am now at another fork in the paths of my life. From here, going back to the fork might not be possible, starting down many of the paths will be a one way trip. I have visualized them and have not yet made my decision. What path? What focus? I realize now that my nature, given the current challenges and situation, is to stay at this fork in the paths, and walk the paths visually instead of physically, for, that way, I can return to the fork. How about you? You KNOW that your path is the best? If so, how? Can you convince others like you that your path is better than theirs? Do we just all split? Really, each doing their own best solution was what the math in the article linked above indicated was the best solution. IE. There is no one best solution. The key is getting people to start understanding the real challenges and thinking of their own best viable solutions? I know this is fragmented and unstructured. It would take some time to improve it. But I am just going to send it and see what happens. Thanks for considering it.